History has shown that the Earth's magnetic poles have switched over past history. How would a modern switch affect such technology as electrical generation, electric motors, and all things magnetic including Compasses and GPS.
I'm sitting here in the dim light of a CFL bulb, using my little laptop, sweating in the July heat because air conditioning is a giant energy-suck and wondering if any personal effort to reduce carbon emissions is worthwhile, when the Large Hadron Collider uses a gazillion bazillion teramegaelephantine watts of power.
I also get kind of bummed out when I watch NASA launch a space shuttle. Really, what is the point of me driving a tiny ultralow emission car?
Santa would have to make toys for every single child in the world, get all across the globe in a single night, sustain his reindeer and would have to power his factory. Surley doing this would produce an incredible amount of greenhouse gases.
Everyone, including movie stars, have a cleanup suggestion for the gulf oil spill. One Canadian researcher is promoting the use of paraffin and has demonstrated some success by turning liquid oils into a solid that can be collected or at least made less dangerous to wild life and shore lines. After many years the poor fellow doesn't seem to have gotten any traction or respect. Is this more bad science?
Googling: "william nelson paraffin oil spill" should give lots of hits.
Probably is a blind shot, but I would like to ask if somebody has calculated the impact in global warming of the direct heat. I am thinking for example in the human population (almost 7 billion with a constant average temperature of 36.5 º C). And not only that, but the average temperature of all the cattle in the world kept by humans, (billions of animals that otherwise wouldn´t exist). Also we could think in the heat from fires (both wildfires and the small ones) and the heat that escapes from our homes, vehicules or industries.