Our smelling sensors are inside the head. Our noses
are vulnerable to damage and the majority of primates and other mammals
manage with relatively flat faces.
We must rid ourselves of the notion that the nose is specifically
made for smelling. The nasal passages serve many functions, but are
independent of olfaction. The nose carries out other well-known tasks
such as the filtration of small particles from the air - to prevent them
entering the lungs - which results in the nasal contents children seem
so fascinated with.
The nasal cavity also serves to moderate the temperature
of incoming air. This is most often appreciated in non-equatorial
regions, where air temperature can be well below body temperature and
may cause shock to the system. The blood vessels that enrich the nasal
passage provide a steady stream of warm blood, which helps to bring the
temperature of incoming air closer to body temperature.
This is possibly also the reason why humans of caucasian
descent that originally evolved to live in the colder northern
hemisphere tend to have longer, more protruding noses than people living
near the equator, where the air temperature varies less, and does not
dip close to freezing.
While these theories are quite widely quoted and have
merit, perhaps the most interesting explanation comes from the school of
thought that humans once had the sea or other bodies of water as their
predominant habitat. The "aquatic ape" theory draws parallels with other
aquatic mammals such as dolphins and hippopotamuses to explain our
significant loss of hair, and abundance of subcutaneous fat compared to
our primate brethren.
Outward facing nostrils would be quite a hindrance to
inhabiting areas that involved being submerged in water for long periods
of time. But by protruding outwards and forcing the nostrils to face
the floor, it is possible for a person holding their head upright to bob
their head under the water without water entering the airways - air
trapped in the nose prevents any water entering. This gives the bearer
of an external nose an advantage of 1 or 2 minutes under water without
having to resurface.
Furthermore, the outer side of the nose has an excellent shape for
swimming forwards. Its streamlined surface ensures that while swimming
head down and forwards at a speed, all incoming water flows with the
least amount of resistance around the face. Moreover, due to the conical
shape of the nose, all water rolls away from the nostrils, diminishing
the chance of it entering the airways.
I believe the two responses to this question published in the most recent print edition omit the most plausible reason for the external nose of humans.
The nose is a real-estate solution to larger brain volume. For the nose to serve it's purposes of filtering air, warming air and keeping out water (primarily rain more than swimming), it needs a sufficient internal volume and the air path needs a certain linear dimension and path complexity (to block rain). In the head of your average mammal this is not a big ask and common evolutionary solutions include the snout or a relatively flat face with most of the nose hardware internally.
Humans evolved with increasing brain volume and this has pushed some of the nose hardware outwards. So water exclusion is largely performed by the now downward facing nostrils and some of the filtering and warming is done in the external area. This frees up valuable real estate inside the head for grey matter.
PS Hmmm I meant this to be a general answer, not a response to this particular response.
An external nose is seen in elephant seals, hooded seals, tapirs,
elephants, swine and, among primates, in the mangrove-dwelling proboscis
monkeys. Various, often mutually compatible functions, have been
proposed, such as sexual display (in male hooded and elephant seals or
proboscis monkeys), manipulation of food (in elephants, tapirs and
swine), a snorkel (elephants, proboscis monkeys) and as a nose-closing
aid during diving (in most of these animals). These mammals spend a lot
of time at the margins of land and water.
Possible functions of an external nose in creatures
evolving into aquatic ones are obvious and match those listed above in
many cases. They can initially act as a nose closure, a snorkel, to keep
water out, to dig in wet soil for food, and so on. Afterwards, these
external noses can also become co-opted for other functions, such as
sexual display (visual as well as auditory) in hooded and elephant seals
and proboscis monkeys.
But what does this have to do with human evolution?
The earliest known Homo fossils outside Africa -
such as those at Mojokerto in Java and Dmanisi in Georgia - are about
1.8 million years old. The easiest way for them to have spread to other
continents, and to islands such as Java, is along the coasts and from
there inland along rivers.
During the glacial periods of the Pleistocene - the ice
age cycles that ran from about 1.8 million to 12,000 years ago - most
coasts were about 100 metres below the present-day sea level, so we
don't know whether or when Homo populations lived there. But
coasts and riversides are full of shellfish and other foods that are
easily collected and digested by smart, handy and tool-using "apes", and
are rich in potential brain-boosting nutrients such as docosahexaenoic
acid (DHA).
If Pleistocene Homo spread along the coasts
beachcombing, wading and diving for seafoods as Polynesian islanders
still do, this could explain why Homo erectus evolved larger
brains (aided by DHA) and larger noses (because of their part-time
diving).
This littoral intermezzo could help to explain not only
why we like to have our holidays at tropical beaches, eating shrimps and
coconuts, but also why we became fat and furless bipeds with long legs,
large brains and big noses.
As the author of the former, somewhat less detailed answer to the question, I would like to say thank you to Dr Marc Verhaegen who has highlighted the extensive paleontological evidence in support of the aquatic ape theory without which, the aquatic ape movement would still be regarded as merely a "theory", as well as the link between a coastal diet, omega-3-fatty acids and the expansion of brain growth. For anyone who would like to know more about this aspect of human evolution, I would direct you to more of Dr Verhaegen's papers, which are extremely extensive and interesting!
If we believe zoologist Desmond Morris, the shape of the human nose
is one of many unique features of the human anatomy that lack obvious
purpose, but that most probably exist to respond to stimulation in one
way or another to facilitate sexual pair bonding.
In The Naked Ape he writes: "One [anatomist] has referred to it as a mere 'exuberant
variation of no functional significance'. It is hard to believe that
something so positive and distinctive in the way of primate appendages
should have evolved without a function. When one reads that the side
walls of the nose contain a spongy erectile tissue that leads to nasal
enlargement and nostril expansion by vaso-congestion during sexual
arousal, one begins to wonder."
In other words, apparently we have big noses to give our partners something else to notice or to play with.
Desmond Morris in The Naked Ape suggests the human nose might exist to respond to stimulation in one
way or another to facilitate sexual pair bonding: "It is hard to believe that
something so positive and distinctive in the way of primate appendages
should have evolved without a function. When one reads that the side
walls of the nose contain a spongy erectile tissue that leads to nasal
enlargement and nostril expansion by vaso-congestion during sexual
arousal, one begins to wonder."
It is hard to believe that Morris thought that human children can be sexually aroused. Professor Paul Van Cauwenberge of the University of Ghent, Belgium, and others, who studied the erectile tissue (plexus cavernosus) of the inferior nasal concha (which can block the nose passage, eg, in vasomotor rhinopathy), found that the nasal (but not penile!) erectile tissue, in human children as well as adults, has an intrinsic rhythm of about 90 seconds - a rhythm that is typically seen in the airways of shallow diving birds or mammals such as sea otters. This is hardly surprising if humans descend from littoral creatures who parttime dived for shellfish (google "econiche Homo"). A littoral lifestyle could also help explain how early-Pleistocene Homo erectus easily spread to different continents and islands, and why the sense of smell - as in many (semi)aquatic mammals - has considerably atrophied in humans.