Advanced search

Answers


What requires more calories: walking up steps or a slope?

A pathway in my neighbourhood splits at an incline into both steps and a slope. Which option requires more calories to walk up or down?

Yonatan Silver, Jerusalem, Israel

(Image: Pat-swan, stock.xchng)

media

Editorial status: In magazine.

sssss
 (no votes)

submit an answer
  • Member status
  • none

Last edited on: 2009-11-25 15:47:10

Categories: Human Body, Animals, Transport, Unanswered.

Tags: uphill, slope, steps, stairs, walk.

 

Report abuse


23 answer(s)

<< First   < Prev   [1]   [2]   [3]   [4]   [5]   Next >   Last >>  


Reply

Anonymous says:
I'm not sure, but I think it would depend on comparing the angle of the slope and stairs, the steeper the angle the more energy you would require. Stairs would seem more tiring to climb as the rate of energy expenditure would be higher than the slope, as you would have to lift your body weight up in steps rather than gradually up a slope. Going down stairs you would also conserve some energy, as its more like controlled falling. Thats my thoughts anyway.I would use the stairs, as they are usually shorter and faster than a slope, which usually has a shallower gradient. Of course animals such as cows would choose the slope - they are unable to go down stairs.
sssss
 (no votes)

Tags: unanswered, animals, transport, human body.

top

posted on 2009-04-24 14:49:00 | Report abuse


Reply

Anonymous says:
While your minds are in this area - I would like to know if it is more efficient to take stairs two at a time rather than singly?
sssss
 (no votes)

Tags: unanswered, animals, transport, human body.

top

posted on 2009-04-24 15:31:00 | Report abuse


Reply

Anonymous says:
The work done in lifting your own weight up the specified height would be the same for both paths (work = force x vert.height)
sssss
 (1 vote) average rating:5

Tags: unanswered, animals, transport, human body.

top

posted on 2009-04-24 17:09:00 | Report abuse

Reply

mattgrubb says:

that formula is correct work = force * vert height

 

the only little flaw to your assumption is does

calories burned = work * vert height ??

 

I would say that it does not.

 

I would say that calories burned has something to do with heart rate, when you extert force in smaller increments walking up the slope you don't push your body as hard, unless you walk faster, then you would increase your heart rate thereby burning more calories. Similarly when going up the stairs if you are going up at a slow pace then you don't burn as many calories as when you push yourself at a quick pace.

sssss
 (no votes)

Tags: unanswered, animals, transport, humanbody.

top

posted on 2010-12-25 05:24:23 | Report abuse


Reply

Anonymous says:
the above comment is very true but presumably taking the slope the muscles in your legs are going to contract more times although with less force... im pretty sure its going to be dependant on the amount of joules the two different type of leg movements require?
sssss
 (no votes)

Tags: unanswered, animals, transport, human body.

top

posted on 2009-04-26 14:39:00 | Report abuse


Reply

David Turell says:
Studies done in ergonomics in the 1950's state that for the average 150 pound person climbing stairs burns 8 calories a minute and descending 5 calories a minute. The first comment is correct. I find personally that 2 at a time is more efficient for me. David J. Turell, M.D.
sssss
 (no votes)

Tags: unanswered, animals, transport, human body.

top

posted on 2009-04-27 14:16:00 | Report abuse

Reply

Tonymsm says:

I agree with the reply of Dr. David Turrell: going down stairs is easier than climbing up them, whether that descent is slow and steady or fast "controlled falling", as mentioned by other responders; and I also find going up stairs two at a time both easier and less dispiriting. However in contrast, when I was at college in London in the 1960s, a favorite game was racing up the "down" escalators at tube stations and down the "up" escalators. While the former was more exhausting than climbing stairs but relatively safe, the latter "controlled falling" demanded high mental concentration and was both foolhardy and highly dangerous.

Comparing the actual work done by the human (or animal) body in climbing or descending stairs to the theoretical physics notion of work as - in this case - equal to the increase or decrease in potential energy is not valid, as in climbing stairs additional energy is wasted as heat loss during the operation of muscles (why you sweat after a hard climb), while in descending the potential energy is not recovered but _must_ be dissipated by the body in resisting the force of gravity (this is where controlled falling comes in) in order to maintain a steady speed. This act of resistance requires the expenditure of additional muscle energy. If you run down stairs, only partially resisting gravity, it doesn't help, because part of your potential energy is recovered as kinetic energy and you still have to dissipate it in slowing from a run to a walk when you reach the bottom.

As for comparisons of steps and slopes, I work in construction, where Building Codes and Health & Safety legislation now demand shallow slopes for accessibility. This has led to significant changes in design, in order to accommodate extended ramps at entrances and between floors of slightly different levels. This becomes important when considering egress in case of fire, because the horizontal travel distance of the ramp is much longer than that of stairs, potentially increasing travel time.

Accessibility considerations aside, on the basis of other responses it seems that there should be a critical slope - probably highly influenced by body configuration and circumstances - below which walking up a slope is less difficult and energy-intensive than climbing stairs and above which the opposite is true. Also, when considering outdoor changes of level, the weather must be taken into consideration: in wet or icy conditions using stairs with flat steps is likely to be considerably safer than using even a shallow ramp.

sssss
 (no votes)

Tags: animals, transport, humanbody.

top

posted on 2009-11-28 11:06:41 | Report abuse


<< First   < Prev   [1]   [2]   [3]   [4]   [5]   Next >   Last >>  

The last word is ...

the place where you ask questions about everyday science

Answer questions, vote for best answers, send your videos and audio questions, save favourite questions and answers, share with friends...

register now


ADVERTISMENT