Advanced search

Answers


Why are some situations funny? What's the biological use for us to react in such a way?

I somtimes wonder why some situations are funny and some are not, why does the body react in such a way when someone else falls or is ridiculed for example, what evolutionary purpose does it hold?

sssss
 (no votes)

submit an answer
  • Asked by hobkirk
  • on 2010-02-04 16:21:50
  • Member status
  • none

Categories: Human Body.

Tags: notag.

 

Report abuse


2 answer(s)


Reply

Jon-Richfield says:

Funny question!

Isaac Asimov wrote a short story in which it turned out to be an alien experiment on humanity. Personally I do not think that he believed a word of his own story, and neither do I. That is my story and I am sticking to it! Or maybe it is sticking to me... Actually Charles Darwin, who was by any reasonable measure decidedly a genius, wrote a book on the expression of emotions in man and other animals. It left a great deal unanswered, but it is hardly fair to blame Darwin for that; much of that puzzle still is unanswered today.

Let's get the apologies over to begin with. My reply will be half anthropomorphic and wholly handwaving. Got that? Then let's go rollicking on, holding our sides all the while!

Amusement is one of our emotions that is based on emotional conflict. Another such example is embarrassment, as the late Konrad Lorenz vividly described in his work on geese. I think he did so in his characteristically brilliant book "On Aggression".

One of the first things to get clear is that every form of amusement (I refer here to anything that we laugh at, but it occurs to me that much of what I am about to say might apply to other senses of the word) has to do with some form of stress: shock, surprise, or threat. The smile accordingly, appears to be derived from the snarl. Laughter seems to stem from defensive aggression noises. Sometimes hysterical or desperate weeping sounds (horribly) like laughter. And laughter is a common reaction to helpless despair in many cultures, such as Roman slaves jesting about their probable crucifixion, or an African peasant's breaking into hearty chuckles when asked what would happen if the rain did not come. "Then we'll all starve!" I saw that in a documentary. The commentator missed the point: "The joke's on us!" was his interpretation. To anyone with a closer acquaintance with the culture, it meant: "We're stuffed!" The attitude was more one of dignified despair than sporting amusement. It was not so much entertainment, as accommodation to the stress.

You may or may not have heard the Swazi "Retreat Song" by Miriam Makeba. It seems to be available on line. It sounds strikingly jolly, but the prospect is anything but. It stems from a time before any Geneva convention, and in Africa a defeat could mean wiping out, and often did.  So cheerfully tell the women and youngsters to "Run like hell!"

Yeah...

Now, very commonly primates will shadow a threat when they are fairly sure that they are safe; for instance monkeys might follow a lion or tiger, with plenty of sounds of defiance and alarm, whereas they might make off in a hurry if they spot a leopard. The occasion for expressing themselves safely to an object of dread appears to be valuable educationally, as well as emotionally. Another well-known anthropoid, Winston S. Churchill, remarked that it is exhilarating to be shot at without effect. And he should know.

And why do you suppose that people enjoy thrillers and horror movies?

Think about how parents teach their children about all the dangers out there, and the pleasures of contemplating them in various ways. Think of how such experiences shade off into humour.

You should be able to derive a continuum from a horrified dying screech, all the way to a wry grin at the thought of the politician who had to see his doctor because he had accidentally told the truth due to a misunderstanding.

Don't rupture yourself in either case,

Jon

 

sssss
 (no votes)

Tags: notag.

top

posted on 2010-02-07 19:49:08 | Report abuse


Reply

sidre says:

There are also theories that suggest we react with happiness (expressed as laughter) to situations in which we learn somehting new.

This theory could explain some characteristics of jokes such as

1) we seldom laugh at the same joke twice, since the second time around we don't learn anything new.

2) a lot of jokes contain a certain pattern which is often repeated twice or thrice. The punchline usually unexpectedly breaks this pattern. This corresponds to learning a rule about the environment (the pattern) and then recording exceptions from this pattern. Exceptions in patterns and how to use them are very valuable information.

3) a lot of jokes (and especially internet videos) see someone getting hurt and/or humiliated. This provides us with information on what to do (or in most cases, not to do) to avoid similiar situations for ourselves.

I also think the above mentioned function of stress relief is one of the most important functions of humour.

sssss
 (no votes)

Tags: notag.

top

posted on 2010-02-08 11:49:49 | Report abuse


The last word is ...

the place where you ask questions about everyday science

Answer questions, vote for best answers, send your videos and audio questions, save favourite questions and answers, share with friends...

register now


ADVERTISMENT