People have died from a fall when tripping over their own feet. Other people have survived falling out of aeroplanes (to be fair, that has always happened when they fell in the right place, such as falling through a tree into deep snow.)
Generally, if you fall directly onto a hard surface, such as a concrete pavement, then falling say, five or 10 stories should be pretty reliably fatal. Let us say 20 to 40 metres.But, as they say, YMMV! (Your mileage may vary. In our example it might be better to say your metres may vary!)
Can I suggest you telephone the Samaritans first? Life has its ups and downs (no joke intended) but you can really get a lot out of it if you try. Have you passed on your genes yet? That's one worthwhile aim to start with. Even if you don't succeed in this, you can do a lot of good by helping other people in whatever way presents itself.
As Jon implies, the human body can be surprisingly tough, but also scarily fragile at times. I fell about 10m onto thin soil with rocks underneath and escaped with soft tissue damage; a friend of mine (another climber) fell not much further and smashed his feet and ankles to bits, broke his back and was lucky to live. I knew a woman a few years back who tripped and banged her head and was dead before an ambulance arrived. One hears extraordinary stories of drunks falling with barely a scratch - though these could be apocryphal.
If your head is protected, the rest of your body can survive an awful trauma. It's not a game to play at home though.
Pete, your points are good illustrations, but I hasten to emphasise to prudent readers that there is nothing magically protective about about being drunk when you fall. I personally knew a thoroughly worthy gentleman with an unfortunately excessive taste for tipple, who fell over backwards on a flight of steps on the way home while under the influence. He fatally broke his neck on a step.
I have heard of many explanations for how drunks manage to survive the many hazards that beset them, falls in particular, and many such arguments have merit in particular cases. However my own feeling is that the frequency of their survival is rather a function of the overrepresentation of drunks in undignified and dangerous situations, so that a disproportionately large number of miraculous survivors happen to have been drunk. Sober people more frequently tend to survive non--miraculously.
Note that I said "survivors"; I did not say that they survived in good health or even good spirit (if you will excuse the term). I read an interview a few years ago with an Australian who had, by some peculiar accident, as yet unexplained, diverged from the Antipodean national standards of sobriety, and presumably had done so to a spectacular degree. I base this speculation on the fact that he, on encountering a gentle-natured King Brown snake, captured it by hand and only got bitten some time later, being driven in a car. I cannot remember who his companions were, and I don't know whether he can either, but apparently one of them was sober enough to get him to hospital in time for treatment that saved his life.
Bearing in mind the nature of King Brown venom, that was in itself a spectacular feat.
Score one for booze, do I hear you cry? Well, make that 0.49 at most. Neurological damage left him permanently paraplegic in various ways. I cannot remember the medical details, but I vividly remember his being quoted to the effect that it did not seem fair that he should suffer the rest of his life just for this one error.
I am hard put for any suitably compassionate response, or indeed any sensible response whatsoever, but the bottom line is that I hope they did not hurt the snake, which had after all displayed the greatest dignity and self constraint of any participant in the narrative.
Of course one treats such interviews with reserve, but...
Jon hardly needs me to defend him, but here goes...
His anecdote was well-told, amusing and interesting
It was made in reply to my comments
This is an English-speaking forum
Though Jon's vocabulary is large and learned, it's seldom obscure
Perhaps this forum doesn't lend itself to off-topic ramblings, but if anyone is entitled to share a few stories, surely it is Jon? The more the merrier I say.
I am sorry if my reply was inconsiderate; that was unintentional, I assure you. Given your profession, I can well understand your sensitivity to inappropriate register. My intention of course was to reply to something Pete said, in full confidence that he would understand. By the time we had got that far into the conversation, I had assumed that discussion had become general, so any discourtesy was unintentional.I'll try to avoid similar transgressions in future, but I am sure that you are well aware that one unconsciously adapts one's register to the company one is addressing, and I happen to be almost pathologically absent-minded.
Aku,
Please tell us if any of us said anything that you want us to explain.