Fairly frequently one seems local paper reports of the domestic power distribition system suffering from "a surge" and some part of it being destroyed.
The Guardian 28/9/2010 has "...power surge caused by copper thieves that led to power cuts ... some household appliances caught fire while people were still in their beds and unaware of the danger.... "
I can "believe" that transmission line effects might cause a double size voltage for one cycle or so ( ?) of the 50 Hz but would expect that the output of the generators / transformers distribution system, long enough to destroy a household appliance under even no load conditions would be no more than say, 110% of nominal.
You say: "I can "believe" that transmission line effects might cause a double size
voltage for one cycle or so ( ?) of the 50 Hz but would expect that the
output of the generators / transformers distribution system, long
enough to destroy a household appliance under even no load conditions
would be no more than say, 110% of nominal."
Sorry, but you are hopelessly too optimistic. Surges on networks are far more complex than one might realise, and very hard to control on a large network. One chap I knew did some research on the problem-prone reticulation supplying a local steel producer. He found that every time they switched off an annealing oven, it caused a spike of some 14000 volts on their nominally 250 volt line... So much for 110%! I never heard what measures were taken to shut off the ovens more gracefully after that. Notice that although switching on the ovens caused voltage drops and swings, they caused nothing like such spikes.
Think of what happens if you abruptly shut a domestic water tap. Your static water pressure might be a couple of bars, nothing too exciting, but get the water flowing and if you stop it abruptly you get loud water hammering, and sometimes actual damage to plumbing.Such effects have been known to burst piping.
Now, electrical reticulations behave in very similar ways. Suddenly break a circuit and even a small battery that could not cause a spark to jump no matter how suddenly you short-circuited it, will cause a visible spark, a spark that would require tens or hundreds of volts to create it. What you are looking at is analogous to the water-hammer effect. You stopped the electric current, and the energy that had gone into building up tha current had to go somewhere!
If you wander round the wilds of Scotland, you will eventually hear a constant tapping at a rate of about one per second, somewhere near a burn (stream), with a house fairly close by. If you trace the tapping to its source, you will find one of these still doing its job. They tend to be made in cast iron, with a makers name and year cast into the metal, and they appear to work without external power or maintenance for something over a century.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydraulic_ram
Being as there are very strong analogies here between water flow and electricity (height vs volts, volume vs amps, inertia vs capacitance), a cycle within this kind of pump is a very strong analog of a power circuit interruption.
Jon is precisely right. Apart from plain "thermal" (resistive heating) loads, almost everything else (motors, fluorescents etc.) works by inducing magnetism through coils. All those devices are designed to match their impedance to the 50Hz AC frequency, and the magnetic fields absorb power just like an oscillating spring. Breaking the circuit dumps all the energy stored in the circuit at once. All that energy goes back into the source cables in a millisecond. And of course, having your fridge and washing machine turn off makes a tiny spike that was designed for. Losing supply to maybe 500 homes is cumulative - everybody's spike adds their voltage back into the distribution network simultaneously. Major distribution switches are designed to operate at the zero volts point in the AC cycle to minimise this effect for planned switching, but cannot do much about sudden circuit breaks.
This is actually how the coil in your car makes 20,000 volts from 12 volts for the spark plugs: the coil magnetises from increasing a current relatively slowly, but the circuit is broken (by points or electronically) abruptly, and the high rate of change in the magnetic field as it decays induces a high voltage.
The fires and further damage are not caused directly by the pulse (although it can blow memory chips and other vulnerable parts). What happens in a domestic unit such as a TV is that the initial over-voltage flashes over to earth, damaging the component insulation by leaving a carbonised track. Normal mains voltage then leaks through the insulation at this point, causing local heating and cumulative damage until something gets too hot to live.
The pont is, that I am suggesting or querying, there cannot be a POWER surge. There can be a voltage surge but only with the total energy stored in the inductance of the distribition lines by the carrent interrupted. I understand that this voltage surge can destroy insulation.
Surely, the water analogy is not valid. The "pressure" of the water is reversing 100 times a second.
You do have a point in that the "surge" involves more than just power, but there most certainly still is a fairly brief, very rapid rate of power delivery to certain parts of the circuitry or reticulation in the circumstances under discussion. This is implicit in the voltage surge among other things. The fact that the total energy stored is the maximum amount of energy available, does not as such determine the maximum power that can be achieved by concentrating its delivery into a very short period of time, and what is more, into only certain parts of the reticulation.
Consider the figure that I had mentioned, of a voltage spike of 14,000 V. Suppose (purely hypothetically and simplistically) that the circuit had been delivering 1 MW at 250 V; suppose that the spike lasted for 10 ms; then for those 10 ms of the surge, the power applied might be something like 56 megawatts. (Yes, yes! I know. Feel free to juggle the figures to your own taste. It still amounts to an abrupt surge in the power applied.)
The water analogy is perfectly valid. In both cases the power surges abruptly when the circuit is broken abruptly. Naturally there are differences between the systems under comparison; that is what an analogy is. Argument from analogy, in spite of a long-standing, ill-considered history of abuse, is almost the only argument we have in dealing with empirical realities; the only basis for criticising it as a principle is when we argue beyond the isomorphism between the systems.
In this case we stay well within the scope of the isomorphism. For example you mention the figure of 100 Hz, which happens to be irrelevant. For one thing the electrical effect would remain in effect whether we were dealing with DC or any frequency up to probably several kilohertz at least. For another, one could make the analogy more exact, though hardly relevantly so, by constructing an aqueous power delivery system in which the power was delivered as vibrations in the fluid. The comparison would remain valid, even if the argument were strained by the pointless insistence on the oscillation as the medium of power delivery.
There most certainly CAN be a plain power surge. Remember the local distribution system is radial, and although the Grid is more interconnected, there are still multiple paths that have higher or lower impedances.
If you are lucky enough to be on the upstream side of a sudden disconnection, all the demands below the break go off. But all the demands connected upstream of the disconnection are now connected to a generator or transformer that has just lost a significant part of its loading. Until the control systems - regulators and taps - stabilise, the generation voltage and frequency will rise, causing excess power to flow into the remaining circuits.
In the worst case, the higher voltage and frequency exceed limits that protect the system by tripping off yet more demand - "better off than fried". So the situation can cascade through the whole supply system catastrophically.
Also, the voltage spike does not arise from the capacitance of the distribution cables. The capacitance and magnetic field storage of the demand devices is orders of magnitude greater.