That was good thinking Jasmin. You are quite correct. You would not even need to throw the dice millions of times.

The way we find out such things, we call statistical analysis, and by carefully counting what we get when we throw the dice, we probably could tell whether the dice are fair or not after just a few hundred throws.

It is in fact very difficult to design dice to be exactly fair. The slightest difference in the rounding of the corners or the lengths of the sides can make a big difference to the way the dice roll, and the score that you get after some hundreds of throws.

As for you, just keep thinking about such things. The more you do, the more interesting the new things that you might discover.

Good for you indeed.

If you come up with an alternative to dice, it might catch on. Necessity is the mother of invention and most advances we make are a result of being dissatisfied with whatever we have already.

Though it is a possibility that this effects the dice. Companies that make dice work REALLY hard to make sure they are as fair as possible. I'm sure that they probably consider the size and shape of each indentation on the dice. Possibly making the 1 side dot bigger or heavier to equal the dots on the 6 side.

The dots on dice are called pips. In casino's the pips on dice are not indented, but are flush (flat), this ensures each side has an equal weight. But I would assume an average set of dice could would have some bias toward rolling sixes, since they always sit opposite one (the side with the least indents, and therefore the most material making it the heaviest side).