The hot components of spicy foods generally are synthesised by biochemical processes within cells. In many cases the cells do not actually synthesise the final product, but harmless precursors that only produce the usually significantly toxic product when those precursors are brought together if the cell happens to be damaged. A spectacular example of this is in the formation of mustard oils; a mustard seed typically has a mild flavour, but if you crunch it between your teeth and keep it in your mouth for more than a few seconds, you will notice a spectacular, progressive change.
However, many other substances are indeed matured within the cell walls, and remain there. Plant cell walls commonly contain highly resistant substances such as cellulose, suberin, and lignin, so some of them survive the process of preparation and cooking so that the spice uselessly passes through our digestive processes to plague or please what ever coprophages might happen to encounter it subsequently. However, freezing causes the largely aqueous contents of plant cells in food to swell, and frequently to burst the cell walls. This releases cell contents, increases the digestible fraction of the food without reducing its value as a roughage, and increases the perceived spiciness of the dish. Perceptive cooks often make use of such effects when appropriate.
My mother always used to make a curry the day before it was to be eaten. She maintained that this was the "right" way because they tasted better when reheated.
It's a brave man who contradicts Jon, so I want to make it clear that I agree with all he says. However, the traditional "hot" spice for curry was black pepper, which is crushed before it is cooked, so the cell wall doesn't need rupturing. The heat in modern curry often comes from chili, the capsaicin which makes them hot is accessible without cell rupture because it is the plant's protection against mammalian browsing. Other spices are usually ground with a pestle and mortar - cumin, coriander, turmeric, fenugreek etc. - so complete cells are broken before cooking.
A traditional curry chef always fries the spice in very hot oil, before adding other ingredients, to "release the aromas" [typically, the procedure is to fry onions and then raise the heat and add the spice]. If that doesn't see off any remaining intact cells, I don't know what would.
cell rupture is tho only reason specific to freezing I know.
Of course nobody ever has made a duble blind experiment
on this.
Tast (which is 90 % smell) is a sense which depends a lot
on actual situation of the person (helth etc) and it is
easily betrayed by preoccupation.
For this :
comes from chili, the capsaicin which makes them hot is accessible without cell rupture because it is the plant's protection against mammalian browsing
there is a different reason, Yo give it in the last two sentences of Your post:
Capsicain, as many (or most) aroma stuff is lipophilic.
This means, it is soluble in fat only.
Georg
PS Every country (or county) has some dish(es) , which are said to be much better
on reheating. This is a German "Poem" on that:
(The English version misses this detail)
Eben geht mit
einem TellerWitwe Bolte in den
Keller,
Daß sie von dem
SauerkohleEine Portion sich
hole,
Wofür sie besonders
schwärmt,Wenn er wieder aufgewärmt.
-
Who wrote that? Christian Morgenstern? It seems to have some of his swing and intimate style, but I know too little of German humorous poetry to comment.
>cell rupture is tho only reason specific to freezing I know<
Just so, Georg.
And having conceded that, I must concede the point to Jon as well.
I wonder if the phenomenon is restricted to dishes that have been heated, frozen and then reheated; or does it work without the freezing stage?
A slight digression: I am very happy to eat reheated stews of all sorts (in this I include curries, and all other meals where meat is cooked in a sauce), but I find the taste of chicken changes much more than other meat when heated up. Is there something unusual about me or the chicken?
About the freezing vs cooling question, I don't know. I should expect freezing to be necessary for best effects.
However, I am not as monogamously wedded to cell rupture as you seem to think. Other things happen in freezing as well as cell swell. For example, the relative solubilities of various substances change, which can lead to segregation of lipophilic compounds. What had been solutions of flavour molecules in fat could separate out as particles of flavour concentrate that would assail your tongue with a great deal more authority than before.
One must remember that it can be a risky business to predict the long-term behaviour of foods. You cannot turn stale bread fresh just by rehydrating it, and it is practically impossible to store coffee (whether roast and ground or brewed) without its flavour changing. Remember, your food is not a chemical substance; it is a system (like the hydrogen/oxygen mix, remember) in which hundreds or thousands of substances are continuously reacting in different ways depending on the mode and duration of storage. and without the reactions neatly reversing on demand. Some of the spicy effects in freezing could even depend on chemical changes, not just physical.