Advanced search

Answers



5 answer(s)


Reply

nonstickst says:

Thought requires neurons firing, which is most definitely slower than the speed of light

sssss
 (no votes)

Tags: ouruniverse.

top

posted on 2011-01-27 21:53:48 | Report abuse


Reply

Jon-Richfield says:

Quite correct NS. Thought is quite a slow process by the standards of sound, never mind light.

I have frequently been nonplussed by mystical attitudes to the speed of thought, often sworn to from their own experience by remarkably slow-witted people;  As I see it, thought appears to be instantaneous when its speed is measured by its own standard. If a yardstick is all you have to measure with, your options for measuring anything less than a yard depend on the sophistication of your mode of investigation.

sssss
 (no votes)

Tags: ouruniverse.

top

posted on 2011-01-28 07:43:26 | Report abuse


Reply

hadrianjeffs says:

The late science-fiction writer James Blish (whose scientific speciality was biochemistry) gave (pardon the pun) considerable thought to this subject, and decided, on reflection, that the speed of thought was not the speed at which neurons fire or nerve impulses travel. His reasoning was that memory, regardless of the distance in time involved, acts instantaneously.

 

Blish, of course, assumed that the act of remembering was not the retrieval of stored data, but a mental transmission to and from the point at which a specific memory was collected in the first place. His concept of memory, as a form of transport or communication, rather than recording, was therefore akin to Marcel Proust’s.

 

As a consequence, Blish decided that memory was proof of the existence of the hypothetical faster-than-light particle, the tachyon, first mooted in the early 1960’s, by Professor John Wheeler of Princeton University’s Institute of Advance Studies. As a consequence of its super-luminal velocity, the tachyon, as the elementary particle of thought, would permit such apparently paranormal phenomenon as telepathy.

 

Whether Blish really believed his carefully reasoned proposition is another matter, but he argued his case very plausibly. So plausibly, indeed, that at least one reported hoax involving an allegedly haunted computer, was promulgated on the basis that tachyon signals from minds either long-dead, or as yet unborn minds are responsible for ghosts.

sssss
 (1 vote) average rating:4

Tags: ouruniverse.

top

posted on 2011-02-01 19:05:32 | Report abuse


Reply

Tijdelijk says:

Here is another thought. Which is faster the speed of sound or the speed of light.

Listen to someone talk, they may seem bright but when you hear what they are saying......... Light is definitely faster than sound.

Nothing travels faster than the speed of light in a vacuum (as far as we know at the moment).

Somebody may be quickwitted but that does not mean that they are bright.

sssss
 (no votes)

Tags: ouruniverse.

top

posted on 2011-02-09 23:49:06 | Report abuse


Reply

Snak says:

The 'speed of thought' is an illusion. It takes 0.5 seconds for you to notice a touch. Your brain then fools you into thinking you felt it straight away. It takes a further 0.5 seconds for you to do anything about it. Yet you will be convinced that your reaction was instantaneous. Proof? Burn yourself accidentally. If you could think and react instantaneously, you'd move before there was any damage at all. As it is, you think you have reacted instantly, but the burn is there to prove otherwise.

sssss
 (no votes)

Tags: ouruniverse.

top

posted on 2012-11-30 18:01:00 | Report abuse


The last word is ...

the place where you ask questions about everyday science

Answer questions, vote for best answers, send your videos and audio questions, save favourite questions and answers, share with friends...

register now


ADVERTISMENT