My theory on how this would work is that say you have the physics set up to produce tacyon particles. Then you have a network that you know they will follow at superluminal speeds. Would they interact (that is tacyons interact with tacyons)through that network? Then when the network is finished its calculation.

it would have to interact with a stream of newly created tacyons particles because those that are already calculating would be impossible to tell when they where finished. Those finished calculations would then interact at a somewhat random time when finished calculation, true given calculation of superluminal velocities you would be able to calculate aprox how long things should take.

As we can see today we are using ddr3 rams, when we can see ddr4 ram?

can we use ssd technology in ram or can we use pci express technic in ram ?

Why not keep them all in the same pattern instead of swapping the top and bottom lines over?

There is a light experiment where a coloured disk with equal red, blue and green sectors is rotated. As the rotational speed increases the coloured sectors coalesce into a white disk, thus demonstrating that white light may be considered to be the sum of three primary colours.

I tried doing this using modern technology - a coloured disk rotating on a computer screen. It didn't work, no matter how fast the disc notionally rotated. I seemed to be getting a slow  stroboscopic effect rather than coalescence. 

Is this caused by a feature of computer screens? 

I thought that computer chips are made out of silicon, a semiconductor. I've read that the resistance of semiconductors decrease as the temperature increases. Therefore, wouldn't the performance of a chip be increased as the temperature increases?

I am looking at the top500.org Performance Development chart of supercomputers since 1993. What's interesting is how the No.500 spot has improved in remarkably smooth increments since 1993; while the No.1 spot has not - rising in distinct steps. This makes sense I guess, the lumps and bumps of innovation, etc. All that fresh air at the top of the mountain. Naturally I can't help wondering though, at what position would the graph change from one to the other.

But my question really is, is this a generalisable phenomenon? So, say, that in any given rankable performance is there a level at which the rate of improvement is predictable?

Or to put it another way, how good do you have to be to be unpredictable?

What is ther point in someone sending spam e-mails that give another computer a virus? What do they gain from this? Do they get information from that computer or is it purely to annoy people and ruin their computer?