Advanced search

Tag 'self-reference' details


Be informed on updates to this list by RSS


1 matches found


can gravity be described without using a model that references space or time an an analogy

We all know that 2x/4x = 4x/8x does not tell us what x is because is cancelled out being referenced on both sides.

Describing  an egg as egg shaped does not tell us what the shape of an egg is.

So why do models gravity using a picture of a “gravity hole  in a mesh of time” as if the weight of a ball is distorting a frame of time. This, surly, is a circular reference effectively saying gravity looks like gravity. Additionally this model has some rather poor comparison’s. And if the mesh is three dimensional then what are the axis of this mesh?  Does this imply time have 3 dimension’s?  Showing a picture of a moving ball rotating around a gravity ball includes a reference to time to describe time itself. Giving two layers of self-reference.

Can anyone explain to the lay public what gravity is without using self-reference. ?

sssss
 (no votes)

There are 2 answer(s) for this question. View answers | Submit an answer

  • Member status
  • none

Categories: Unanswered.

Tags: Space, gravity, time, einstein, spacetime, self-reference.

 

Report abuse

1 matches found


The last word is ...

the place where you ask questions about everyday science

Answer questions, vote for best answers, send your videos and audio questions, save favourite questions and answers, share with friends...

register now


ADVERTISMENT