With the exception of sperm whales' off-centre
blow-holes and some crabs' single large claw, all complex organisms I
can think of are effectively symmetrical along one plane of their body.
What is the least symmetrical organism?
With the exception of sperm whales' off-centre
blow-holes and some crabs' single large claw, all complex organisms I
can think of are effectively symmetrical along one plane of their body.
What is the least symmetrical organism?
While swimming one morning across Coogee Bay in New South Wales,
we came across thousands of these strange creatures (see photo)
floating at depths down to about 2 metres.
They
were hard but also flexible, with water inside and a small hole at one
end. Their length varied from about 3 to 30 centimetres and their walls
were between 2 and 5 millimetres thick. Their skin was marked with many
small protrusions, the size of which varied from one creature to
another. Unlike jellyfish they appeared to be completely harmless.
No one I've spoken to from the area has ever come across anything like this. So what were they and why were they there?
Philippe Wilmotte, Maroubra, New South Wales, Australia
As I was reading your description of the mystery item, I could not help but be reminded of the description of a simple sea sponge I read in my high school biology class workbook many years ago. It has only one orifice at the top through which food drifts in and the remains drift back out. The other end is usually attached to a rock or some other item under water. Possibly a recent storm was enough to dislodge them. Or this might even be a certain stage in there life cycle when they set themselves loose to drift, their only means of locomotion when nearby edible material is hard to come by.
With the exception of sperm whales' off-centre
blow-holes and some crabs' single large claw, all complex organisms I
can think of are effectively symmetrical along one plane of their body.
What is the least symmetrical organism?
FWIW, it is worth avoiding confusion of the loofah and the sponge. The (bath) sponge is the one with a membranous texture. It is the "skeleton" of an animal, while the loofah is a fibrous skeleton of the fruit of a plant related to a cucumber. In fact, young loofahs are eaten as a vegetable before their fibres develop. At least one species of the genus Luffa is grown in parts of North Western South Africa and Namibia. When the fruit has ripened and lost the skin and pulp, it is cleaned of seeds and debris and voila! "To wield the lordly loofah..." as Michael Flanders put it!
Anyway, I digress. The loofah is vegetable and therefore does not count. Some small sponges such as Euplectella do have sorts of symmetry (and beautiful biology too, well worth looking up on line!)
But Luffa isn't among them! :-)
Cheers,
Jon
With the exception of sperm whales' off-centre
blow-holes and some crabs' single large claw, all complex organisms I
can think of are effectively symmetrical along one plane of their body.
What is the least symmetrical organism?
Many sponges do have some degree of symmetry, the loofah or bath sponge, for instance.
Furthermore, a sponge isn't a true multicellular organism, being more like colony of choanoflagellates, each of which has near perfect radial symmetry.
My vote for the least symmetrical group of animals goes to Amoeba and its relatives, most of which have no symmetry at all.